REDWOOD LOGIN
Redwood PortalLTL
SCS
SCS Support
Rockfarm
Written by: Thomas Deakins
EVP, Alliances, Redwood Logistics
Adjunct Professor and Lecturer, Haslam College of Business at the University of Tennessee, Department of Supply Chain
We are in the middle of one of the biggest hype cycles I’ve seen in my career.
Agentic AI. Generative AI. Autonomous decisioning. AI copilots everywhere.
The excitement is real. The opportunity is real.
But so is the risk.
I am bullish on AI. I believe it can be a massive competitive advantage. But I also believe we need to approach it with discipline, not like the Wild West.
Because if we don’t, history will repeat itself.
If you were in business during the dot-com boom, you remember the rush:
"We need a website."
"We need e-commerce."
"We need to digitize everything."
Adoption happened fast. Money flowed even faster.
And then came buyer’s remorse.
Why?
Because buyers and sellers weren’t aligned.
They didn’t agree on:
The inputs required
The outcomes expected
The operational impact
The ROI model
Sound familiar?
Today, AI is walking the same tightrope.
Too many organizations are asking:
“How do we use AI?”
Instead of asking:
“Where specifically will AI improve our business, and how will we measure success?”
Successful AI adoption requires far more than a shiny demo or a compelling pitch deck.
It requires discipline.
Here's the uncomfortable reality:
1. A Clear Strategy — Not Experiments Without Direction
AI must align to business priorities.
What are the top 3–5 areas of improvement?
What KPIs will change?
What does success look like in 6, 12, 24 months?
If leadership cannot clearly articulate this, pause.
AI is not a strategy.
It is an enabler of a strategy.
2. Defined Outcomes and Measurable Results
You must define:
The business problem
The baseline performance
The expected lift
The financial impact
Without this, you’re not implementing AI — you’re funding curiosity.
And curiosity without accountability becomes waste.
3. Clean Data + Master Data Management Strategy (Garbage In = Garbage Out)
AI does not fix bad data.
It amplifies it.
If your data is fragmented, inconsistent, or poorly governed, AI will simply accelerate poor decisions at scale.
You need:
Clean, standardized data
A defined Master Data Management (MDM) strategy
Governance ownership
Clear accountability
Otherwise, you are building intelligence on a broken foundation.
4. Signed-Off Change Management Plan
Technology implementation is easy.
People transformation is hard.
AI impacts workflows, reporting lines, performance metrics, and accountability.
You need:
A formal change management plan
Executive sponsorship
Clearly assigned deliverables
Communication cadence
Defined adoption milestones
Without this, adoption stalls.
And stalled adoption kills ROI.
5. Workforce Strategy — Not Just Technology
AI will change roles.
Some tasks will disappear.
New skills will be required.
Talent will shift.
Organizations must answer:
What new skills do we need?
What talent must we hire?
Who do we reskill?
How do we protect morale?
If employees feel AI is being “done to them” instead of “done with them,” morale drops. Culture suffers. Productivity declines.
That’s not innovation. That’s disruption without direction.
The biggest danger isn’t the technology.
It’s misalignment between:
Leadership and IT
Buyer and seller
Vision and execution
Expectations and deliverables
When that gap widens, AI becomes:
An expensive experiment
A drain on resources
A source of frustration
A culture disruptor
And in the worst case — a competitive disadvantage.
AI can drive:
Faster decision-making
Increased efficiency
New revenue streams
Better customer experiences
Smarter operations
But only if the foundation is built correctly.
If strategy, governance, data, workforce planning, and change management are aligned, AI becomes a force multiplier.
If not, it becomes just another failed transformation initiative.
I’m excited about Agentic AI and Generative AI.
I believe they will reshape industries.
But I also believe:
Move fast — but not recklessly.
Innovate — but with structure.
Experiment — but with measurable goals.
The companies that win won’t be the ones who move first.
They’ll be the ones who move strategically.
I’m curious: